We live in a world of Unrealistic Expectations.

Like I keep saying:

Being Fat is Hard
Losing Weight is Hard
Maintaining Weight is Hard
Choose your Hard.

Fat Is Officially Incurable (According to Science)
              By: David Wong

Let's get this straight: The number of people who go from fat to thin, and stay there, statistically rounds down to zero.

Every study says so. No study says otherwise. None.

Oh, you can lose a ton of weight. You'll gain it back.
Here's one study running the numbers.
Here's a much larger analysis of every long-term weight loss study they could find. 
They all find the exact same thing: You can lose and keep off some minor amount, 10 or 15 pounds, for the rest of your life -- it's hard, but it can be done. Rarer cases may keep off a little more. But no one goes from actually fat to actually thin and stays thin permanently.

And when I say "no one," I mean those cases are so obscenely rare that they don't even appear on the chart. They can't even find enough such people to include in the studies. It's like trying to study people who have survived falling out of planes. Being fat is effectively incurable, every study shows it, and no one will admit it.

So the guy or girl you see in the "Before" and "After" photos in weight loss commercials, who completely changed body type with diet and exercise? You know, like Jared from Subway, who lost 230 pounds? Either they're about to be fat again in a couple of years, or they're a medical freak occurrence, like the sick guy who was told he had six months to live but miraculously survives 20 years. That guy exists, we all know famous examples. But it's a rare, freak situation, living in defiance of all of the physical processes at work.

How rare? Well, this person did the math and as far as they could tell, two out of 1,000 Weight Watchers customers actually maintain large weight losses permanently. Two out of a thousand. That means if you are fat, you are 25 times more likely to survive getting shot in the head than to stop being fat.  

Meanwhile, here's an article where scientists marvel at the amazing success of Weight Watchers, because a study of their most successful customers showed they permanently lost 5 percent of their weight. Wow! You come in at 300 pounds, you stay at 285!   Next stop, thong store!
 
So please remember this the next time the subject comes up at the office or on some message board and you get bombarded by thin 20-year-olds insisting the obese need to just "cut out the junk food" or "take care of themselves" or "do some exercise." The body physically won't allow that for a formerly fat person.

"Well, just stop eating so much!" Sure, kid. To feel what it's like, try this:

Go, say, just 72 hours without eating anything. See how long it is until the starvation mechanism kicks in and the brain starts hammering you with food urges with such machine gun frequency that it is basically impossible to resist. That's what life is like for a formerly fat person all the time. Their starvation switch is permanently on. And they're not going 72 hours, they're trying to go the rest of their lives. It's like being an addict where the withdrawal symptoms last for decades. Here’s a breakdown of the science in plain English.

As that article explains, the person who is at 175 pounds after a huge weight loss now has a completely different physical makeup from the person who is naturally 175 -- exercise benefits them less, calories are more readily stored as fat, the impulse to eat occurs far, far more often. The formerly fat person can exercise ten times the willpower of the never-fat guy, and still wind up fat again. The impulses are simply more frequent, and stronger, and the physical consequences of giving in are more severe. The people who successfully do it are the ones who become psychologically obsessive about it, like that weird guy who built an Eiffel Tower out of toothpicks.

Statistically, the only option with any success rate is a horrible, horrible surgical procedure. I can find no data whatsoever that says otherwise. Keep all of this in mind the next time you see a Jenny Craig or Bowflex commercial.

            David Wong of www. cracked.com

We need to stop lying to ourselves and quit swallowing all of the media headlines.
Diets aren’t bad, and we aren’t starving or ruining our metabolisms.
Chances are you won’t lose weight fast.
Stop wasting time looking for a silver bullet.
It’s not there.

   The word “diet” means the stuff one eats.
Everyone is on some sort of diet.

Diets, meaning calorie restriction, DO work.
If we restrict what we eat below what we need each day to run our bodies,
the scale will move. If not, hurry over to a research lab
and let them write you up in a medical journal,
because you’ve figured out how to create energy from nothing.

Adopting some TEMPORARY habits, losing weight,
and then picking up those previous habits again doesn’t work.
The weight always returns.
 
Live one way, lose weight. Live another way, gain weight. 
Go figure.
Diets work.
While you’re arguing with me about it, I’ll be watching my calories.

Three of
the most frequent
Diet MYTHS are:

First, the idea that we need to detoxify or cleanse our bodies;

Second, the idea that we need a plethora of dietary supplements to stay healthy; and

Third, the idea that eating specific foods or products will increase metabolism and make us lose weight.

Notice how often these three Myths are associated with the marketing of unfounded ... (and even potentially harmful) ... diet products.

 

Should we be afraid for our health
because we're fat?

Or is the "Obesity Epidemic" a Myth,
and losing weight to get "healthy" 
just another Anti-fat Biased Hype?

Our Absurd Fear of Fat
                     By Paul Campos: January 3, 2013 New York Times

ACCORDING to the United States government, nearly 7 out of 10 American adults weigh too much. (In 2010, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention categorized 74 percent of men and 65 percent of women as either overweight or obese.)

But a new meta-analysis of the relationship between weight and mortality risk, involving nearly three million subjects from more than a dozen countries, illustrates just how exaggerated and unscientific that claim is.

The meta-analysis, published this week in The Journal of the American Medical Association, reviewed data from nearly a hundred large epidemiological studies to determine the correlation between body mass and mortality risk. The results ought to stun anyone who assumes the definition of “normal” or “healthy” weight used by our public health authorities is actually supported by the medical literature.

The study, by Katherine M. Flegal and her associates at the C.D.C. and the National Institutes of Health, found that all adults categorized as overweight and most of those categorized as obese have a lower mortality risk than so-called normal-weight individuals. If the government were to redefine normal weight as one that doesn’t increase the risk of death, then about 130 million of the 165 million American adults currently categorized as overweight and obese would be re-categorized as normal weight instead.

To put some flesh on these statistical bones, the study found a 6 percent decrease in mortality risk among people classified as overweight and a 5 percent decrease in people classified as Grade 1 obese, the lowest level (most of the obese fall in this category). This means that average-height women — 5 feet 4 inches — who weigh between 108 and 145 pounds have a higher mortality risk than average-height women who weigh between 146 and 203 pounds. For average-height men — 5 feet 10 inches — those who weigh between 129 and 174 pounds have a higher mortality risk than those who weigh between 175 and 243 pounds.

Now, if we were to employ the logic of our public health authorities, who treat any correlation between weight and increased mortality risk as a good reason to encourage people to try to modify their weight, we ought to be telling the 75 million American adults currently occupying the government’s “healthy weight” category to put on some pounds, so they can move into the lower risk, higher-weight categories.

In reality, of course, it would be nonsensical to tell so-called normal-weight people to try to become heavier to lower their mortality risk. Such advice would ignore the fact that tiny variations in relative risk in observational studies provide no scientific basis for concluding either that those variations are causally related to the variable in question or that this risk would change if the variable were altered.

This is because observational studies merely record statistical correlations: we don’t know to what extent, if any, the slight decrease in mortality risk observed among people defined as overweight or moderately obese is caused by higher weight or by other factors. Similarly, we don’t know whether the small increase in mortality risk observed among very obese people is caused by their weight or by any number of other factors, including lower socioeconomic status, dieting and the weight cycling that accompanies it, social discrimination and stigma, or stress.

In other words, there is no reason to believe that the trivial variations in mortality risk observed across an enormous weight range actually have anything to do with weight or that intentional weight gain or loss would affect that risk in a predictable way.

How did we get into this absurd situation? That is a long and complex story. Over the past century, Americans have become increasingly obsessed with the supposed desirability of thinness, as thinness has become both a marker for upper-class status and a reflection of beauty ideals that bring a kind of privilege.

In addition, baselessly categorizing at least 130 million Americans — and hundreds of millions in the rest of the world — as people in need of “treatment” for their “condition” serves the economic interests of, among others, the multibillion-dollar weight-loss industry and large pharmaceutical companies, which have invested a great deal of money in winning the good will of those who will determine the regulatory fate of the next generation of diet drugs.

Anyone familiar with history will not be surprised to learn that “facts” have been enlisted before to confirm the legitimacy of a cultural obsession and to advance the economic interests of those who profit from that obsession.

Don’t expect those who have made their careers on fomenting panic to understand that our current definition of “normal weight” makes absolutely no sense.

Paul Campos is a professor of law at the University of Colorado, Boulder, and the author of “The Obesity Myth: Why America’s Obsession With Weight Is Hazardous to Your Health.” (2004)

At present the word Healthy
has now just become another word for
Thin or Lean or a “Normal” BMI.

Those trying to lose weight often say it's for their health.
But is it?

I don’t choose to view myself as a “victim”, so haven’t written a great deal about Anti-Fat Bias which involves an ongoing victimization process.

My perspective is that: I accept that the Anti-Fat perspective is a Truth of Life within our culture.
I also accept that I’ve spent a great deal of my life being fat.

My own life experiences taught me how to establish boundaries between myself and people who demonstrate ignorant, unkind, or encoaching behavior on the issue of Fat and me…. and to emotionally move-on-past any such annoyances. As a result of my own attitudes and behaviors, after I reached about age 40 …. although still fat…., it became very rare for people to make any socially negative remarks to me about my size.

Still, my major motivation to lose weight and to maintain weight loss has a great deal to do with Anti-Fat Bias … both in myself, and in others.

Why We Diet

            By Abigail Saguy   -   Los Angeles Times,   January 4, 2013 ,   

If your resolutions for the New Year are typical, they probably include a pledge to lose weight. But if you are like most Americans, any success you have shedding pounds will be short-lived, and you'll end the year weighing more than you do right now.

So why are Americans obsessed with weight loss? Many people say they want to lose weight to improve their health, but this may not actually be their primary motivation. In one of the more interesting polls I've seen, more than three-fourths of the 231 dieters surveyed said that they would take a pill that would guarantee they would achieve or maintain their desired weight even if it would lower their life expectancy. On average, they were willing to give up 5.7 years. Moreover, 91% said that they would not take a pill that would lengthen their life by five years if it guaranteed that they would also remain overweight. This was a small sample, but it is consistent with other research. For instance, a book published just last year showed that the desire to fit in or be "normal" — rather than improving health — is the primary motivation for many people who undergo weight-loss surgery.

These findings may seem puzzling, but they are not so surprising when you consider weight-loss attempts for what they really are: efforts to protect against weight-based discrimination. The fact is, fear and loathing of fat are real, and American attitudes about fat may be more dangerous to public health than obesity itself.

Yale researchers have shown that weight discrimination in the United States has increased dramatically in the last decade and is now comparable in prevalence to rates of reported racial discrimination, especially among women. Multiple studies have documented weight bias in employment, healthcare, education and public spaces — unequal treatment based on stereotyping fat people as lazy, unmotivated, sloppy and lacking in self-discipline and competence. Heavier women are not only less likely to be hired and less likely to earn a higher salary compared with their similarly qualified thinner peers, but they are also less likely to marry or to marry a high-earning spouse. Unlike thinner women, who can more easily climb the social and economic ladder, heavy women face the prospect of downward social mobility.

When I was doing research for a book on the social understanding of fat, several heavy women told me they were often reproached for eating in public. Some tearfully shared stories of having had people actually throw food at them. Other researchers have documented a practice called "hogging," in which young men sexually prey on fat women and then, during the sex act, have their male friends jump out of hiding and humiliate them. Heavy women are routinely ridiculed in advertisements, television and film. Even children express negative attitudes about their heavier peers, a tendency that has gotten worse in the past 40 years.

Of course, there are genuine health risks associated with higher body mass. The clearest case is that of Type 2 diabetes, which becomes more likely as weight goes up. Yet as many medical researchers have pointed out, this association may not be causal. That is, it's not clear whether obesity per se causes diabetes, whether diabetes causes obesity or whether both conditions are caused by a third factor, such as poor nutrition, stress or genetic factors.

It has become increasingly clear that the link between weight and health is complicated. In some cases, higher body mass seems to protect against mortality. For instance, there is growing evidence documenting an "obesity paradox," in which elevated body mass is associated with lower mortality among people with heart disease and among those with Type 2 diabetes. And a recent report in the Journal of the American Medical Assn. concluded, after analyzing almost 100 studies, that people with body mass indexes in the overweight category were at less risk of dying in a given year. In fact, they found that even those in the moderately obese category — in which the greatest number of Americans classified as obese fall — were at no greater risk of dying than those in the normal weight category.

So it's not as simple as many assume, and we have much to learn about what these observations mean. But it is clear that anti-fat bias in and of itself takes a toll on public health in ways many may not suspect. Fear of ridicule leads many heavier women to avoid exercising in public or even — when they are very heavy — to avoid leaving their homes, depriving themselves of social interaction. Because many heavier women experience the doctor's office as a hostile environment, they are less likely to get Pap smears, which leads to higher rates of cervical cancer among women categorized as obese. And the fear of becoming fat can lead women of all sizes to develop eating disorders and body image problems that can diminish their lives and be dangerous to their health.

What should be done about weight-based discrimination?

The answer is to call for increasing tolerance and appreciation of diverse body types. This year, before embarking on yet another diet, ask yourself why you want to lose weight. If it is to improve your health, perhaps you should focus on health-enhancing behaviors that are more directly linked to health: pledge, for example, to get more sleep, eat more fruits and vegetables, get regular physical activity, or spend more time with friends.

But if you are trying to change your body to shield against discrimination and stigma, consider making a different kind of New Year's resolution: to stand up to intolerance and bigotry in all its various forms, whether racism, sexism or fatphobia.

Abigail Saguy is an associate professor and vice chair of sociology at UCLA and the author of "What's Wrong With Fat?"(2013)

Personally, I don’t think fat bias is more prevelant today than it was 50 years ago. I think that because today more people are fat, researchers are paying more attention to the issue, and I think that in the current decade, it has become more politically incorrect for people publically air their negative opinions unless they are disguised as a helpful concern for the HEALTH of a fat person.

My own past experience ….

In my high school years – late 50s to early 60s, Jackie Kennedy look-a-likes … were the norm…and my 5’1” tall, 115-125 lb body .. was considered quite “plump .. verging on fat”. The bodies of the majority of teenage girls …(certainly the popular ones) … resembled Betty, of the tv show “Father Knows Best”.

Girls dressed up then, they didn’t wear trousers in high school or church, or at work. These were only generally acceptable when one engaged in sports, worked in the outdoors, or relaxed at home. Outfits commonly seen were the sheath dress styles worn by Jackie which hid my waist and emphasized my hips. Gathered skirts were also popular, but these also emphasized my my curves. People… my classmates, my friends, my parents often told me I was too fat, so I dressed differently from the others, in dresses cut in “princess” and “A-line” styles to make myself appear “thinner”.

During my young-adult years, when I was fat, people primarily showed weight-bias to me by disapproving facial expressions. Far too often, these looks were accompanied by negative comments .. many times strangers asked me “when I was due”, or told me that I “needed to diet”. In public places, strangers often stared at my food, and if that food appeared “fattening”, openly gave me disapproving looks and sounds, and even made personal comments such as “you shouldn’t be eating that.”. If the food appeared to be “non-fattening”, strangers would sometimes provide “encouraging” communications, which … of course …. also let me know they judged my body size as inappropriate.

Here are a very few examples of my personal experiences with weight-bias in the early to late 1960s,   Bear in mind, except for obesity… I have been in good health all my life, I’ve never had high-blood pressure, or any need to take ongoing prescription medication due to any health problem. Prior to my older years, my height was just above 5’1”, and my frame is medium. For perspective, using the BMI charts, “normal” weight for me was between 100 to 130 lbs.

Being “too fat” was never a subjective thing like as part of an eating disorder. I wasn’t a thin teenager who merely thought she was fat. My family members  (including my parents),  school mates, church friends, various acquaintenances, and our family doctor, all indicated ... both by words and actions, ... that I was too fat.

Before puberty, I was “normal” weight.  At puberty, I grew to my full  height of 5'1", and my weight shot up close to 150. At age 13, dieting brought me down to a low of 113 lbs, and I maintained a weight of around 125 lbs during most of my high school years .. by ongoing food restriction. I restricted food for myself, and my parents often restricted my food further.

I remember that at around age 16, weighing 125 lbs, my M.D. told me … and my mother … that I needed to drop some more pounds, and I should not weigh more than 105 lbs.

When I was about 17 ½ years old, also weighing about 125 lbs -- one of my girl friends enlisted in the Navy, and I went with her on one of her visits to her Recruiter. I remember saying… “Hummm, maybe I should consider enlisting”, and the Recruiter replied, “No, you’re way too fat, you’d have to lose about 20 lbs before the Navy would take you.”

At my grandmothers funeral I was 19 years old, and I weighed about 135 lbs. One of my male cousins sought me out, came up to me and volunterred the information that I was too fat, that I still looked okay, but if I gained more weight I wouldn’t, and I really needed to take off a lot of weight.

Also, when I was 19, I applied for a job of telephone operater for Pacific Bell. I passed the written tests, and went for an interview. I recall that my weight was around 135 lbs, and I was dressed in the most flattering syles available to me. The woman interviewing me told me that my " test scores were very high", but I was "too fat for the job", and I "weighed too much to pass the required physical". This was based on my appearance during the interview, as well as my job application which required me to fill in my weight, together with my height, marital status, age, number of children, and race.

When I was about 21, after my pregnancy and birth of my daughter, I weighed about 220 lbs. At my first (and only)  visit with a Dentist for a toothache, that dentist told me that I was very, very fat and if I didn’t lose weight, I ‘d be in a wheel-chair in a few years, and I probably wouldn’t live to be 30.  Recalling this event, I remember that I wasn't surprised to have a dentist make a personal comment about my weight, or surprised to hear him predict disability and death. At the time, comments such as this by relative strangers simply didn't register as inappropriate behavior.

When I was about 25, I worked night-shift as a temporary clerk for the County of Portland, Oregon. At that time, I weighed about 135 lbs, having successfully lost 100 lbs on a long-term, low-calorie diet. During my physcial for the job, the doctor said I was basically healthy, but that he could barely bring himself to let me pass the physical because I was too fat, and he poked my stomach and said, “so flabby”.  I replied by telling him  that I had just lost 100 lbs, but he just shook his head and said “you need to lose at least 25 lbs more, and do a lot of exercise .. you’re still fat.”

These are only a few examples, and such events were not unusual for the time. People in general weighed a lot less, and adults were far more willing to openly share their contempt for people who “allowed” themselves to be fat. Some tried to disguise their contempt as helpful, and there were some who genuinely wanted to help me rid myself of weight which they – and society in general -- found unacceptable.

Twenty years ago when I was a morbidly obese 271 lbs, I had a gastric bypass. My body was fat but healthy, I didn’t do it to get “healthy” or to live longer. I did it because I wanted to be successful at weight-loss and maintenance. I hoped it would make me lose all of my fat, get me to “normal” weight; relieve me of the stigma of being fat and make me more attractive to myself, and to society in general.

Of course, this surgery didn’t get me to a “normal” size, just made me a smaller obese person, and it’s taken years of dieting since then to make my size look “normal”.  Although my current weight is near the top of my BMI normal range (between 120-125 lbs),  now the population in general is about 20 to 30 lbs heavier, which makes me seem thinner by comparison. Nowadays, I often see teenagers and young aduts who are generally considered “normal weight” even though they are MUCH fatter than I was at that age. “l Sometimes I look around me in amazement, and ask myself… “Where were all these fat people when I was young? By today’s standards I looked Good.”